Yes Bank AT-1 Bonds: ₹13,000 Cr Write-Off Quashed
India's Supreme Court upheld a ruling that Yes Bank cannot simply write off AT-1 bonds worth over ₹13,000 crore. This is big news for retail investors who lost money and a warning for anyone holding bank bonds today.
Many retail investors were sold AT-1 bonds thinking they were FDs — same counter, same relationship manager, very different risk.
Your bank's AT-1 bonds may not be as safe as you were told
Key Takeaways
Check your 2018–2020 investment statements — if a bank branch sold you 'perpetual bonds' or 'Basel III bonds', verify whether they were Yes Bank AT-1 bonds and consult a securities lawyer about filing a claim.
Avoid buying any bank bond labelled 'AT-1', 'perpetual', or 'Basel III tier-1' without reading the full prospectus — these can be legally written to zero and are NOT covered by the ₹5 lakh DICGC deposit insurance.
If your bank relationship manager pitches a 'high-yield bond better than FD', ask explicitly: is this an AT-1 instrument? If yes, treat it as equity-level risk, not fixed-deposit safety.
India's Supreme Court upheld a ruling that Yes Bank cannot simply write off AT-1 bonds worth over ₹13,000 crore. This is big news for retail investors who lost money and a warning for anyone holding bank bonds today.
Here's what happened: India's Supreme Court upheld the Bombay High Court order quashing Yes Bank's 2020 write-off of Additional Tier-1 (AT-1) bonds, a decision that could expose the bank to liabilities exceeding ₹13,000 crore.. During Yes Bank's bailout in March 2020, the RBI-led rescue plan wrote off approximately ₹8,415 crore of AT-1 bonds to zero — wiping out thousands of retail investors who had been sold these instruments, often as FD alternatives.. Yes Bank shares dropped over 14% following the ruling as markets priced in the risk that the bank may now be legally required to compensate AT-1 bondholders, significantly impacting its balance sheet..
What you should do: Check your 2018–2020 investment statements — if a bank branch sold you 'perpetual bonds' or 'Basel III bonds', verify whether they were Yes Bank AT-1 bonds and consult a securities lawyer about filing a claim.. Avoid buying any bank bond labelled 'AT-1', 'perpetual', or 'Basel III tier-1' without reading the full prospectus — these can be legally written to zero and are NOT covered by the ₹5 lakh DICGC deposit insurance.. If your bank relationship manager pitches a 'high-yield bond better than FD', ask explicitly: is this an AT-1 instrument? If yes, treat it as equity-level risk, not fixed-deposit safety..
AT-1 bonds are NOT deposits — DICGC's ₹5 lakh insurance covers only savings, current, FD, and RD accounts. Bond losses are entirely uninsured, no matter which bank sells them.
Explore TARA — Your Financial Co-Pilot
Retirement, tax, EMI, refinance and savings calculators — all free. Get a plan aligned to YOUR income, goals and CIBIL.
Try TARA — Free →References
- [1]“SC upholds Bombay HC order quashing Yes Bank AT-1 write-off” Latest Money & Banking, Financial News Today - news | The HinduBusinessLine · 15 Oct 2026
This article is reported by GoCredit's Editorial Team based on the source above. GoCredit synthesises, contextualises, and adds India-borrower-relevant analysis. We are not the original publisher.
Every story here posts to X the moment it breaks. Follow @gocredit_news →